Pontefract. Or was it Pontefrac? Unsurprisingly, the weather was a little slippery when I arrived. As I negotiated the slight hill that Monkhill station was perched upon, I slipped and slided down, expectant of a weekend full of booze, and Yorkshire puddings. I had well and truly arrived in the North. I rang Northern Rail Hotline who put me through to the local taxi guys operating in the area. It didn’t take too long, but I had my copy of Monocle to keep me from getting wet. The driver pulls up and asks me what I was doing in the Pontefract. I said I was here for a friend’s wedding. He said oh cool, but do you prefer living in the UK or do you dream of South East Asia?

I thought about it, and I said here. Maybe it was the weather, but thinking about it, it was probably because of the wonderful people who’ve invited me to their wedding on this very occasion.

I love Matt & Michelle to bits, when I started my first real job five years ago, Matt was there with me from day one. Since then, we’ve had some great laughs together, spent many Friday afternoons staring at his – then – superiorly large Bravia LCD TV, and you know, Michelle and Matt look so beautiful together.

’twas a lovely wedding in Pontefract. ‘Twas perfect.

<< back to start >>

Current Panel: Total Panels:

There are already tens of expertly flesh out reviews of this camera online, but I thought it would be helpful to add my practical experience with the camera.

I like street photography, but I also take food photos to go with my food blog, so a discreet camera has always been desirable for me. The Nikon D700 does a fine job of course, but sometimes I wish I could have something more pocketable, but still offer full frame.

I bought the M8… and truth be told, I thought it was a horrible camera. In good light and at base ISO, the files were brilliant; However the camera just couldn’t do low light. Anything past ISO640 and the images weren’t very good. I couldn’t shoot point light sources at night, as I would get weird green bands shooting across my photos. The M8 also required lenses to be fitted with UV/IR filters, and if you didn’t put them on, you would get alot of colour pollution, ie, black would turn purple. And it wasn’t full frame. Given that I use my camera out on the streets and inside restaurants, mostly pretty bad natural light, the M8 was too slow a camera, it just couldn’t get the job done.

Skip forward a generation, and Leica retooled the sensor, made it full frame, and I believe have done away with alot of the issues that plagued the 8.

The M9 has a full frame, 18MP CCD sensor, made by Kodak. ISO range from 160 – 2500, rangefinder is optimised for 1m with a magnification of .68x. Alot has been written about the absence of an AA filter, where its purpose is to eliminate moire patterns, but at the expense of sharpness. So therefore, with the M9 (as with the M8) , you’ll instantly realise the sharper images, once you download them to the computer, when comparing the images against DSLRs which normally have AA filters fitted to their sensors.


Aesthetics, ergonomics and the basics.

Leica M9 vs Hasseblad 500C/M

Leica M6 vs Leica M9

So the M9 is pretty small, but not smaller than the film Leicas. It’s body is quite abit thicker and it affects grip. And since it lacks a film rewind knob, its ergonomics are actually worse than a film Leica, in my case, the M6. Yes it is significant smaller than my D700, especially when comparing lenses of equivalent focal length, but a thumbs-up grip would be needed to improve handling. Otherwise, just the heft of the camera itself, will have it slipping from your fingers.

The back.

The LCD isn’t very good. It’s 2.5in at a resolution of 230k, which is about the same as say the Nikon D40 from five years ago. In other words, the M9 LCD is just pants. You can just about review sharpness using the screen, but you can’t really judge the rest of the image from the screen. My D700 has a 3in screen at 920k , and I gather so do most SLRs these days, and there is simply no comparison.

On the topic of functionality, Leicas are minimal, which is in total contrast to SLRs – a good thing – as it is thought one would spend more time shooting rather than chimping. There is a dedicated ISO button, and another for image review.. and well, that’s all I need to know really.

From the top.

The camera is completely manual, and looks almost exactly like the top of the M7. An on/off dial and the shutter release, plus a shutter speed dial. Focus and aperture ring on the lens… and that’s all the control required to take a picture. Isn’t that great? Choose aperture, choose shutter speed, focus, trip the shutter. I do somehow wish there was an option for a film advance lever, to ‘simulate’ the effect of advancing to the next frame, or in this case, to recock the shutter manually too, ala the Epson RD-1. But that’s really just for nostalgia.

Apart from the digital sensor, the M9 operates very much like my M6, and for all intents and purposes, the cameras are interchangeable in use.


On the streets, in good light

Towpath Cafe, ISO160, 75mm APO-Summicron ASPH at f2, 1/180s.

Queen’s Park Station, ISO250, 75mm APO-Summicron ASPH at f8, 1/60s.

Oxford Street, ISO320, 35mm Summilux ASPH at f5.6, 1/90s.

Tottenham Court Road, ISO320, 35mm Summilux ASPH at f8, 1/45s.

…and at low ISO values anything from 160 up to 640, the camera is phenomenal. But I think the quality of the Leica lenses contribute to the images too. Especially a fast lens, the bokeh irrespective of it being a modern design with aspherical elements or a Mandler pre-asph design, is pleasing. I noticed that images made with Leica lenses seem to have a wide tonal range, especially with the pre-asph lenses. You can push the contrast levels to much higher levels than Nikon lenses. It seems like much more can be done in post processing with Leica files. Although, DNGs from the M9 seem to look fairly usable SOOC, abit of tweaking in Lightroom, would really bring out the images gracefully.

I don’t have scientific comparisons, but I think that generally, the M9 produces a more pleasing colour palette than compared to the M8. For some reason, the images carry a film-like quality to it, and some images look as though it were shot with my M6 and with Portra. In terms of dynamic range, I don’t think it matches up to print film, probably not even on par with slide film either. With the sky as a backdrop, the M9 will almost consistently blow it out, when exposing for the ground, and when exposing for the sky, all detail in the ground is several stops away from rescue in Lightroom. Again, don’t have the numbers for this, but the dynamic range seems tighter than my D700. It was a good 3 stops to pull detail out from an outdoor shot, and even then, the noise levels were fairly high.

Leica M6. Leica 35mm Summilux Pre-ASPH at f8. Kodak E100G. Somewhere in Norway.

Shooting Kodak E100G for example and exposing for the ground, one can still arrive at a useable image. So I suppose Dynamic Range might be a general area of improving sensor design, and perhaps one of the major reasons why digital images still don’t have the ‘look’ of film.

On the streets, when the sun goes down

Oxford Street, ISO400, 35mm Summilux ASPH at f5.6, 1/60s.

Oxford Street, ISO800, 35mm Summilux ASPH at f4, 1/125s.

Bicester Village, ISO 160, 35mm Summilux ASPH at f5.6, 1/90s.

Personally, I feel that Leica lenses have a tendency to make the best of rather dull weather. Maybe it is to do with their ability to resolve fine detail, maybe they have very low distortion, whatever the case, I fall in the camp where I think that Leicas have some ‘magic’ in making pictures. It’s just an aesthetic quality that no other lenses seem to be able to emulate.


In the dark.

Soho. ISO 1250, 35mm Summilux ASPH at f1.4, 1/45s.

Soho. ISO 1250, 35mm Summilux ASPH at f1.4, 1/90s.

In my experience, I think the M9 produces images which are useable up to ISO1250. Beyond that, the images lose detail and look horrendously digital. In practical terms, I think it makes it 1 stop ‘faster’ than the M8 in terms of useable images. I had initially set the camera to go to 1600 and 2500… but what you get are these strange bands in the image, not noticeable from a normal viewing distance, but it is apparent when you push the image in Lightroom.

What you do gain with Leica glass is speed however, and more importantly, useable speed, since most if not all Leica lenses can be used wide open without the introduction (with little I should say) of unwanted artifacts, aberrations or loss of sharpness at plane of focus.


People

Oxford Street, ISO320, 35mm Summilux ASPH at f1.4, 1/750s.

Oxford Street, ISO400, 35mm Summilux ASPH at f1.4, 1/125s.

Bob Bob Ricard. ISO800, 35mm Summilux ASPH at f1.4, 1/25s.

Bob Bob Ricard. ISO640, 35mm Summilux ASPH at f1.4, 1/60s.

I thought I’d included a few more photos of people. I think this is where Leicas really shine. I think shooting portraits are the hardest things to do in photography, purely because it is the most ‘objective’ of genres… well relatively anyway…objective in the sense that we have preconceptions about what people are meant to look like. As opposed to still life, where colours and shapes can be distorted ever so slightly, and still be presented as a reflection of reality. It may be to do with the extremely well corrected and well designed lens in itself, whatever the case, making portraits of people using a Leica, produces pleasing results.

Black & White

Marble Arch. ISO320, 35mm Summilux ASPH at f8, 1/25s.

British Museum. ISO320, 35mm Summilux ASPH at f1.4, 1/30s.

Charing Cross Road. ISO2500, 15mm Heliar at f4.5, 1/15s.

Shaftesbury Avenue. ISO2500, 15mm Heliar at f4.5, 1/25s.

Like the M8 before it, I think the M9 is a great monochrome camera. At ISO2500, black and white images looks great, the noise looks very much like grain. With abit of pp, I could almost get it looking like Tri-X…but of course, nothing is quite like real film grain.

Bokeh

Atari-ya. ISO320, Leica 50mm Summicron at f2, 1/125s.

Aperture Photographic. ISO640, Leica 50mm Summicron at f2, 1/60s.

Cumberland Hotel. ISO1600. Leica 75mm APO-Summicron ASPH at f2.8. 1/45s.

This is more a function of the lens rather than camera. Yes..all that money, for Leica lenses make for plentiful and pretty blur. The Leica 50mm ‘cron, being the classic Mandler designed lens, shows – to my eyes – great bokeh. Very smooth, and pleasing. The bokeh from the 75cron is more modern, crisper, but equally creamy, to me anyway. The only lens I owned in the Nikon range that rivals Leica bokeh is the Nikkor 85 f1.4, IMHO. I suppose this is an area the M9 bests the M8. Full frame bokeh is just nicer. Not that I shoot alot of blur, but it is nice to look at from time to time.

Food photography with the M9.

La Goulette. ISO800, Leica 50mm Summicron at f2.0, 1/45s.

ISO800, Leica 50mm Summicron at f2.0, 1/60s.

Bincho. ISO1250, Leica 75mm APO-Summicron ASPH at f2.8, 1/60s.

Yashin. ISO1250, Leica 75mm APO-Summicron ASPH at f2.8, 1/90s.

Towpath. ISO160, Leica 75mm APO-Summicron ASPH at f2.8, 1/125s.

I’m fairly unorthodox, in that I use a 35mm with my Nikon to shoot food photos. But SLR lenses have the advantage of focusing much closer than rangefinders, my 35mm for instance, focuses down to 0.3m, which gives me a magnification of 1:5, or 0.2x, which is good enough for close food shots.

The close focus distance is important to me, because being a restaurant blogger, it’s not recommended to stand up on one’s chair to take a snap of the food. So I need to move in close, as opposed to shooting from a meter away with a longer lens.

The M9 is so small, the lenses are tiny in comparison to SLR lenses, so the whole package is much more discreet physically. Almost like a man-sized P&S. The shutter makes much less noise since it is not accompanied by mirror slap – which also means slower usable hand holding speeds – it almost seems the ideal tool to carry into restaurants. However, rangefinders only focus down to a 0.7m, and for me, that’s quite a major hurdle. There is an older generation 50mm that will modify the focus range to 0.5m…but it isn’t compatible with the digital Leicas. The other option, is the modern 90m f/4 focusing to 0.5m, but that’s far too long for by the table food photography, and f/4 is just too slow. Given the limited usable ISO range and relatively low lights in restaurants, a fast lens is necessary.

So narrowing down the 2 lenses which I could possibly use for food photos are the 50mm summicron and the 75mm Summicron. Both focus to 0.7m at magnifications of 0.08x and 0.14x approximately. Not as close as my Nikon 35mm f1.4 AIS…but close enough.

So.. the verdict. You can sort of use the Leica to shoot food, but at times, you will miss your SLR. To get the composition right, you’ll need to crop. The focus distance is a bitch. 70cm away from the table is very far. That means leaning way back, outstretch neck, and pushing the viewfinder up toward the tip of my eyebrows. It works with abit of practice, but I lose the creative options. The number of ways you can frame the picture, while sitting down, reduces immeasurably. I was trying to find ways to wiggle out of my chair, in the end, I gave up looking through the finder and I was estimating focus with the camera free floating above my head. Giving away control over framing was initially, disconcerting. More over, the M9 focus shifts at its focusing limit, in my case, the lenses back focused, so in order to get the shot, focus bracketing was necessary. Not really an issue for digital, but it is rather annoying when you cannot confidently depend on the camera to focus. The precision of rangefinder focusing may be true for a calibrated camera with a complimenting lens, but if you use multiple lenses, I think you will experience focus shift (to a small degree) , especially with the sensor being able to resolve so much from the sharp lenses, that make discerning focal planes easier.

I really wish Leica would re-release an updated version of the Dual Range 50mm Summicron for the digital Leicas. Or some kind of ‘goggles’ that can increase the focusing range somewhat. Not that anyone really uses Leicas for close-up work (discounting the bulk of the Visoflex with 65 Elmar), but I feel that the 50cron DR for the digital age would be a flexible lens. At a magnification of approximately 0.3 to 0.4x. it would be more than enough for mild close-ups, and improve the camera’s overall flexibility. Of course, some Leica shooters have managed to mount the 50mm DR to their M8/9s in its close focus mode, so are able to focus from about 1m to 0.5m. Although the lens doesn’t quite work from 1m onwards, as the focusing cam will hit something inside the chamber of the camera. In a sense, this is good news for me, it will get me a magnification of about 0.14x, similar to the 75 cron actually, though it increases the creative options immensely if this is the case

…I am in the process of securing one, 2nd hand, made in ’61…

It does seem like a lens that Leica could easily update, or perhaps even a macro adapter for the current generation 50 summicron, as they had once done several decades ago with the SOOKY-M adapter.

As it stands, this is a £5000 camera that cannot quite do everything, and thus limited in application.

The bad news

You will have to trade in a kidney to buy one. At £4950 (2010 prices) , it’s expensive. Unfortunately, it can’t really do close-ups, nor can it do telephoto. And relative to DSLR sensors, the ISO range is limited. Despite what is perceived as one of its strengths, in actual fact, it is not true. Leicas do not work well in low light. The rangefinder may require it to be calibrated to particular lenses. Focus shift (at least on my lenses) is minor, but it is noticeable . Oh, and for a £5k, it is not weather sealed.

The good news

However, if you want a capable 35mm camera in a tiny package and you regularly shoot at normal focal lengths from 24 to 75, at 1m and beyond, and you shoot in good light, natural or artificial, then the M9 is a beautifully crafted machine. The images have an indescribably attractive quality about it. They certainly carry a certain signature, assuming you attach a Leica lens to the body that is. And speaking of Leica lenses, they are the chief reason why the M9 is relavant, in my opinion. Not to say that Zeiss or Voigtlander lenses do not deliver nice images, they do, but Leica lenses just deliver the perfect balance of tonality, bokeh, distortion contributing to a a pleasing image that – more often than not – exudes character.

After a few weeks…

…I would be lying if I said I don’t enjoy shooting with the M9. It’s a lovely camera. When you nail it, the image is great. Focus shift is noticeable with the 35mm Summilux and the 50mm Summicron (but not the 75mm), but as it consistently back focuses, and quite slight (maybe a 5mm give or take?) , it’s a problem that is easily dealt with.

Is the camera worth £5000? Well… if you were after value for money, then obviously it isn’t. You pay a premium for the luxury of the red dot. Or in my case, the black dot. Form plays a major factor in the price too, I feel. You won’t find a smaller 35mm full frame digital camera. The design is very appealing indeed.

Some might find the archaic controls a little backwards, but it is the reason I find such joy with the camera. It feels like my M6. For all intents and purposes, the M9 is interchangeable with the film Leicas. It is the ultimate enthusiasts’ camera. It is small enough to carry around as if it were a P&S, and I find myself preferring the M9 to the M6, for its sheer convenience. I still believe that film has a certain quality that digital cannot yet emulate, but for the instant feedback, nothing beats digital.

It could be a great tool, but given it isn’t weather sealed, and the risk that the rangefinder might go out of wack if the camera is seriously knocked about (not to mention loss of resale value), it makes the camera seem rather fragile.

But in spite of what the system’s inherent weaknesses, ultimately, it is about image quality, and in that regard, coupled with a great Leica lens, I think it makes the M9 worthwhile.

Hyde Park, near Speaker’s Corner, September 2010.

London.

It was a fairly quiet affair. While the hacks reported a 80,000 turn out, I didn’t think there were quite so many. If there were, then perhaps many were behind the fences as the ticketed event excluded many of the faithful. The uniformed policemen had little to do, aside from chatting up the girls.

Of course, I was there more as a vulture to document those who didn’t buy a ticket to see the Pope, but showed up anyway. There was an instance where an elderly couple stood there, waiting as we all did for what seemed like hours till the sun went down, before the Pope-mobile finally made its way down to Hyde Park. She asked if I was Catholic. I said no, and she said she wasn’t neither. But her husband was, he was ‘disappointed’ with the Church, hence the long faces.

There were some oddities with a ticketed event, for a vigil, that I assumed was meant to reach the masses. It was run like a rock concert, tall green borders separated the rest of fawning masses from those who paid to see the man himself. On one instance, a little old lady – on crutches no less – hurried to a slit between where two green walls met, and peered into it, hoping to catch a glimpse of the leader of her faith.

I’d like to think the excluded are those who are most faithful, they sang praise and worship songs to a green wall, as they could only hear but a murmur from the exceptionally muted speakers with which the Pope’s voice could hardly be heard.

A portrait of faithful Britain ?

<< back to start >>

Current Panel: Total Panels:

Weddings are such great fun. Weddings always mark a moment of reflection, be it if you are attending as a guest, or whether if you are more deeply connected to the couple. Weddings are defining, memorable, melancholic, alcoholic, touching, beautiful, romantic, traditional, unrelentingly human.

I’ve known Jon for close to four years now, spent about a year seeing him on a daily basis, as we share the same working space. We got drunk together, we’ve debated the wide, the ridiculous, the mundane over several lunch hours, and we’ve rubbed shoulders on the basketball court many a time.

I was elated, fortunate and immeasurebly humbled to have had the chance to witness Jon and Susan’s marriage. The ceremony was fantasy, it was pure bliss and it was resplesdent. We gathered, initially under the threat of a stormy afternoon, at Pettycur Beach in Kinghorn, Scotland. The jitters were not just butterflies, we were shivering a little in the breeze. As momentum built, as the witnesses arrived en masse, as we settled to the blue seats slowly sinking into the sand, the bag pipes began its rhythmic march, and as the groom and his merry ushers and his best man stood proudly, ready and waiting to receive the bride to be, we braced.

She arrived, she is beautiful, aglow in a glowing gown and then the heavens had to burst open, gracing the afternoon with warming rays of golden light. Jon shook the hand of the man who gave Susan away.

One last embrace. For me, the moment occurred right at this point of the ceremony, as Jon & Susan prepare to become Husband & Wife, I noticed Jon furrowing his brows, controlling his emotions, folding his lips and fighting to contain his tears of joy.

Jon & Susan, quite literally tie the knot, scooped soil into a common bucket of life and became Wife & Husband.

As the night worn on, I reflected over my second dinner of nips, tatties, stovies and haggis. I felt fortunate, tearful, inspired, happy and a little drunk. I thought of my life, my love, my parents, my brother, my mistakes, my triumphs, my friends, my career, my ever expanding waistland and played a love song in my head. As I watch the guests loosen their ties, discard the high heels and bust their buns on the hardwood, I broke a smile.

<< back to start >>

Current Panel: Total Panels:

You can view the entire 300 image set on my flickr account as two separate private galleries:
Part One The Ceremony ; Part Two The Reception.

Susan & Jon have embarked on a seven month long honeymoon around the round, they keep a blog.

<< back to start >>

Current Panel: Total Panels:

This is what food blogging looks like. Today, he is trying an experiment, by training his antiquated film camera on a plate of cheese and fruit all the while bobbing to tunes streamed from the internet to his touch sensitive media device that can also make calls, sometimes. Once he exhausts his roll of C41s, a 19th century design, he will digitise the developed negatives, ready then for digital publishing. Welcome to the 21st century. The freedom and availability of the world wide web has encouraged a whole generation to express themselves and it has given rise to the consummate amateur in a bid to announce his average punter’s opinion to the anyone who cares to listen to the broadcast. And boy, did he shout at the top of his lungs. With the advent of Web 2.0 architecture, it brought cheaper and sleeker tools to this very amateur publisher who sometimes thinks of himself as an independent voice, raging against the very system which had chewed him up for so long. The 21st century has also opened up the world of photography and decoupled the learning curve and the burden of developing costs to endow the end user with more image processing capabilities than ever before. Respect for good light is essentially a thing of the past now, as a sleuth of new cameras, equipped with highly capable digital sensors which can quite literally see in the dark. Now, everybody can be a photographer.

An Introduction

People often ask me what camera I use, often I will say that I shoot with a Nikon D700, but that does not really tell you much about my picture making abilities, because photography is much more than just a choice of camera. You’ve got to think about subject matter, framing, composition, quality of light, direction of light, post processing methods, lens choice, depth of field and so goes the list. All of these decisions impact one another when in pursuit of the perfect exposure. Even if you achieve personal perfection, it is a largely subjective state. A technically perfect image might not be an aesthetically pleasing picture, in which case, it just means it’s a bad photograph, or is it? Subject matter trumps technical quality. While it means that a superstar photog like say, Chase Jarvis will be able to grab startling results with his iPhone (good enough to publish as a photo book) it doesn’t mean that the iPhone is his camera of choice (various accounts suggest that he is also, very much a Nikon man). A camera is a tool which helps to get the job done. The better the tool, the easier and quicker the job can be done. But it is the photographer who makes the photograph, not the image making machine. Once you get your head around to that, you’ll realise that the best camera is actually the one you have on you right now.

Still, that’s the romantic way of looking at a craft, realistically, gear is just as important as skill when it comes to making photographs. If I had my way, I’d shoot with a Hassy 503CWD everyday. If I had my way. But the tension that photographers have with regards to gear/skill is a debate that rages on everyday. Would Dan Winters still be able to make his painterly portraits with a 35mm camera instead of his 8×10 setup? The best camera just simply isn’t good enough, if you have the thirst for achieving perfection in photographs, then it is only natural for your mind wonder about the latest technology floating about in the ether. Sometimes, I think of ‘upgrading’ as a way to buy into technical quality, but never asthetic quality.

And so I thought I would present a little guide to purchasing cameras, in case you ever wondered about the diverse range of products out there which a generation of bloggers might use to create their sumptuous photography. Whether you are a budding food blogger, or just someone wanting to learn abit more about cameras, this guide should prove to be a suitable introduction into the different types of formats available in most consumer driven economies. I’ll try to keep things fun too, let’s begin shall we.

Single Lens Reflex Cameras

SLRs have a long history with photo enthusiasts throughout the ages, some of the world’s most well-known photographs have been made with classic SLRs of their time, namely the Nikon F.

Single Lens Reflex (SLR) cameras are by far the popular choice amongst food bloggers, if not professionals in general, not to mention the weekend Robert Frank wannabes. The way SLRs work are such that you see exactly what the lens sees. I know this seems like an intuitive and obvious design, but you would be surprised at the vast array of camera technologies out there which does not abide by this philosophy, some of which I will speak about later in this guide. In every SLR, lies a mirror box which deflects light from the lens into a glass penta-prism which then bounces the image the lens sees, to the viewfinder and then finally to your eye. From there, you are able to see what the final image looks like, then it is just a matter of framing and focusing before deciding to squeeze the shutter. When that happens, the mirror flips up to allow light to pass through to the shutter, which then opens to allow light to pass through to the film/sensor. When the photograph is exposed, the mirror flips down again. You can usually hear the ‘mirror-slap’ everytime you make an exposure… to some it’s music, to others (like myself) it’s equivalent to cow-fart, we gearheads prefer our cameras to be dead silent, so we can ‘blend-in’. Much of the bulk of an SLR camera is down to this inherent mirror-box/penta-prism design which takes up much of the space inside an SLR, see the large head on the camera? That’s where the penta-prism lives.

You will notice that I have not talked about digital SLRs yet because digital and film SLRs are essential the same design. The way you make the photograph is the same, it is simply that the recording medium, the film, has been interchanged with a digital sensor. SLR designs encompass a wide range of cameras designed to work with a wide range of film sizes, though let’s keep things simple and limit this part of the discussion to just the 35mm format. We’ll leave the larger formats to latter part of this guide. The 35mm format has a 3:2 ratio and it physically measures 36mm x 24mm. You’ll see why this dimension is important in a second.

Now, I assume you are mostly interested in digital rather than film, you want the beef on the latest digital stuff. There are several major brands out there including Pentax, Olympus and Sony who build great consumer SLRs, but most tend to fall in either the Nikon or Canon camp. Why you say? In the film days, the Nikon F was the professional’s choice primarily because of their sleuth of sharp and fast manual lenses. Nikon were also one of the first companies then to build very use-sable wide aperture, wide angle lenses such as the Nikkor 35mm f1.4 AIS for example – the photo-journalists choice. Eventually, Canon started building their EOS system and today their professional ‘L’ range of lenses have surpassed the Nikon cannon. It doesn’t stop me from buying Nikon though, more on lenses shortly.

In the digital world of SLRs, there are two terms you need to be familiar with : cropped sensors and full frame sensors. The latter is simple : a full frame sensor is equivalent in physical dimensions to a 35mm film negative. This is significant because it allows you to use the lenses as they were originally intended. The size of a film/sensor affects depth of field (how much in front/behind the focus point is in focus) and this is the key factor which compels users to buy into SLR systems : so that you can isolate subjects from the background, by blurring it out. Ironic don’t you think? The more money one spends, the blurrier the photo becomes… The larger the recording medium, the less the depth of field, the more accurate the focusing needs to be, to produce a good exposure. So in short, full frame cameras allow you to nail that striking look, with a higher degree of background blur using the equivalent lens/aperture compared to a cropped frame camera.

So what is the deal with cropped sensors then? Well, a cropped sensor basically means that it is smaller than a 35mm sensor/film. Usually about 1.5 times smaller, it is otherwise known as the APS-C format. The cropped sensor leads to a cropped field of view and changes the way your lens sees things. A 24mm lens is no longer 24mm on APS-C, it becomes a 36mm lens (1.5 x 24mm). The sensor only sees the centre cropped bit of the image projected by the lens and not the entire image which it is capable of projecting. While you lose out on perspective, what you gain is a cheaper camera. A full frame camera will set you back about at least £1800, very few companies make full frame SLRs, three to be exact : Sony, Nikon D700 and Canon. In the cropped sensor world, there is an abundance of choice and they start from as low as 300 quid. If you ask me, a Canon 400D will give you pictures equivalent to the 7D… 90% of the time. The only tangible differences are perhaps down to ruggedness in body construction, ie plastic body versus magnesium alloy.

Coming back to the mirror box conundrum again. The sheer size and noise an SLR camera makes is, in my opinion, it’s biggest problem. Sometimes, I feel like a pap on a dinner table. Try aiming a D3x attached with a 24-70 f.2.8 (plus hood) at someone, I guarantee that the first few seconds of facial expressions will be… interesting.

So here’s my recommendations if you want to buy an SLR system

Budget You will hardly go wrong with the cheapest SLR choices from all the major manufacturers. There is currently no such thing as a ‘cheap’ full frame camera, so all budget choices are equipped with APS-C CMOS sensors. Sometimes you will find older bodies which utilise CCDs instead, such as the Nikon D40, go for it. The differences should be minor, but I personally prefer CCDs, they make cleaner, less plasticky pictures.

1. Nikon D3000 body only £339
2. Canon EOS 1000D body only £319
3. Sony Alpha A230 body only £329

Mid-range This is a contentious category, I debated as to whether I should include this because I feel that in the digital world, there is no such thing as mid-budget bodies. I have made photographs using a D40 (200quid) and D700 (1700quid) which are at times difficult to tell apart, and that’s comparing a cropped sensor versus a state of the art full frame one. Semi-pro bodies use ‘advanced’ cropped sensors, they build them with better viewfinders, and more rugged shutters as well as a much tougher body. But in terms of the picture making element, the sensor, the differences as I said are slight. Going from a cropped sensor to a full frame is another matter altogether because you gain benefits with regards to a change of perspective and so forth. But if it’s between a high end and low end cropped sensor body, I think it’s really a just matter of personal preference. Oh but they shoot video too…

1. Nikon D300s body only £1100
2. Sony Alpha A550 body only £700
3. Canon 7D body only £1250

Pro. Congratulations. You have money to spend, wow. The best digital 35mm full frame format SLRs money can buy as follows:

1. Nikon D3x 24 megapixels, body only. £4800
2. Canon EOS 5D Mk II 21.1 megapixels, body only. £1600
3. Sony A900 24.6 megapixels, body only. £1900

…. and I shoot with a Nikon D700, body only £1700. Take your pick, if you have 2k to splash, all cameras in this category are awesome. If you fail to make a good photograph, you can’t blame the machine.

You will have noticed that I have only recommended you buy a ‘body only‘ camera. What about the lens? Well first of all, forget about bundled zoom lenses – they suck. Don’t believe what the camera guy says, 18-55mm cheap zooms are just that cheap zooms. There is a reason why pro level £1200 24-70 f2.8 lenses exists, and also the reason why professionals use them. NOW, here’s where the real excitement begins…

The importance of Lenses

There is a rule of thumb when it comes to splurging on system cameras. Save as much as you can on the cheapest body but spend as much as your budget will allow on the lens. Think about it, the lens is the first bit of kit that comes in contact with light.

It is also the only physical medium which light must travel through in order to reach the sensor/film. So therefore, the lens then represents the ultimate bottleneck in a picture making machine. Slap a poor lens on a sophisticated full frame camera and you will be depriving the benefits of that detail monster. You might as well buy a cheap cropped frame body. Hence the arguement, lenses : ultimate bottlenecks. 90% of my food photography is shot using just one focal length and one lens. The Nikkor 35mm f1.4 AIS, fully manual, 1960s design. Hard to believe? It’s true. None of my lenses are longer than 4 inches and long lens envy is a myth. Unless you are a sports photographer needing to nail a portrait shot of Becks from half a mile away, you will not need a 400mm. Traditionally, lenses were made in one focal length only. We call them prime lenses. Lenses which have the ability to change it’s own field of view are known as zooms. You can think of zoom lenses as a bunch of primes lenses in various focal lengths in one neat package. If zooms are so convenient, then why do primes still exist? Well prime lenses are much easier to design which means higher image quality that almost always trumps zooms (save for a few exceptions). And prime lenses have much larger apertures, much larger.

The lens aperture is denoted by it’s f number. The larger the aperture, the smaller the f number and the thinner the depth of field (when shooting at largeaperture/lowfnumber). This leads some photogs to use the expression ‘wide open’ when it comes to creating images with a shallow depth of field. Opening up the aperture, effectively allows you to blur the background out and isolate the subject from the background by keeping only the subject in focus. The quality of the blur is something photogs obsess over early in their hobby, the term which describes the unquantifiable quality of the blurry bits is called ‘Bokeh’. An example is the photograph above, just look at the bokeh (forgive the pun).

With the advent of cropped sensors, you will need to rethink your lens considerations as they will change the FOV of your lenses, reducing the effective FOV in most cases by the factor which I’ve used previously. Hence a 24mm becomes a 36mm and so forth. Let’s try to rationalise the numbers and see if we can categorise lens focal lenghts in 35mm format :

Wide Angle Lenses from 14mm to 35mm They have a wide field of view and they start from around 14mm which is equivalent to 114 degrees. Human vision is about 120 degrees. Normally, wide angles are used by photo-journalists who are close to the action and who want to capture as much information as possible. A 24mm is usually considered ‘wide’ and allows you to capture say the 3/4 of the subject matter standing 1m away from you, guesstimating anyway. A 35mm is ‘semi-wide’, if you shield off your temples with your hands, that’s roughly a 35mm, ok maybe a bit wider.

Lens suggestions
Full Frame : Nikkor 24mm f1.4G , Canon 24mm f1.4L , Nikkor 35mm f1.4 AIS, Zeiss ZF 35mm f2 Distagon T, Canon 35mm f1.4L, Sony 35mm f1.4G SAL-35F14G… and the Nikon 14-24mm f2.8G – stunner.
Cropped Frame … there’s no compelling primes to consider really.

Normal lenses 40mm- 60mm The ultimate normal lens is the classic 50mm. Some say it mimics human vision, and because it is so natural, others think it’s a weird focal length which is not wide enough, nor is it long enough. Either way, the 50mm is one of the least expensive routes into achieving striking bokeh isolating portraits.

Lens suggestions
Full Frame : Nikkor 50mm f1.8 AFD, Canon 50mm f1.2L, Zeiss ZF50mm f1.4 Planar
Cropped Frame: Nikkor 35mm f1.8G DX, Canon 35mm f2.0

Macro Lenses Ah yes, herein lies the true strength of the SLR system : Macro photography. It is one of the few systems which allow 1:1 reproduction and can reveal microscopic worlds. Macro lenses are specially designed for close-up photography, and particularly suited for food. They are extremely well corrected up-close and the closer you get, the more striking the portrait. So. The choices.

Nikkor 60mm f2.8ED , Nikkor 105 f2.8ED VR. -> The latter is superior.
Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM
Zeiss 50mm f2.0 Makro Planar

Telephotos These long lenses are primarily used to shoot portraits, longer lenses tend to produce a compression effect which appears to make subjects look slimmer. Not always of course, but say 70% of the time, you’ll find that people look more ‘flattering’ when portraits are shot with telephotos. This is also the reason why wedding photogs lug around huge white lenses. That’s usually a 200 or a 300 f2.8L if I am not mistaken.

As I said before, I’m not a fan of telephotos, but if you are obsessed with bokeh, do yourself a favour and invest in either the Nikkor 85mm f1.4 AFD or AIS (the above photo is shot with this), Canon 85mm f1.2L, Zeiss 85mm f1.4 Planar. These are all awesome lenses.

The Rangefinder

Now that we are over the overly long discussion about SLR, lens designs and so forth, lets now move to the other camera systems on the market. Forgive me if I get abit melodramatic in this section, but to me, rangefinders inject magic into photography, these are not mere tools, these are the optical equivalent of wizard wands.

Rangefinders are archaic designs. Popular in the beginning days when 35mm was the then ‘compact camera format’, we’re talking 20′s, 30′s and 40′s folks. Now, only a handful of manufacturers make them, mostly for film only. If you ever shoot rangefinders, I guarantee you will fall in love with the freedom that 35mm brings to the picture making process. Rangefinder cameras are much, much smaller than SLRs mainly because they do not have mirror boxes or pentaprisms. This also means that the photographer does not see what the lens sees. Instead the photographer focuses the image through a ‘rangefinder/viewfinder’ which sits on top of the camera, decoupled from the lens. That is to say that the you would not see what the camera sees, instead the viewfinder is literally just a window through which the photographer sees the world. Bear with me as I try to explain this.

The viewfinder shows framelines for the different focal lengths of the different lenses you snap on. So in other words, you can see what’s coming in and out of the frame. This is useful since it allows the photographer to ‘see the world’ and then choose to cut away which ever detail as he sees fit. Now in the centre of the viewfinder is what is known as the rangefinder mask. This mask shows a split image. When you point the camera at the subject, you need to focus the lens until the two split images align. When they align, the subject is then in focus. That’s right, manual focus only. Rangefinders require a higher degree of commitment from the photographer, but the completely manual nature of the camera does mean that you think about every exposure more and nailing the shot is all the more rewarding. You’ll find that over time, your basic knowledge of photography basics improve with time. You’ll find yourself estimate the intensity of light and you’ll think in stops and handheld shutter speeds, you’ll also build up a mental focal scale as you become adept with estimating focus distance…is it a 1m or 1.3m and so on. You become a ‘better’ photographer. Overtime, you’ll become baffled with the automation of modern SLRs, adjusting aperture, shutter speed and focus manually would be second nature.

Zeiss, Cosina Voigtlander and Leica currently still make film based rangefinders. In history, there has only been three digital models ever made: The Epson RD-1 (out of production) , the Leica M8 (phasing out) and the Leica M9 (the world’s first and only full frame digital rangefinder on the market). When one speaks about rangefinders, usually one is referring to Leica cameras. These legendary cameras are hand made out from their Solms factory in Germany, and the German engineering is so revered and precise that Leica cameras are said to be able to outlive their first owners. There is great mystique attached to Leicas primarily because they have been the camera of choice for so many of the worlds greatest photographers in history, particularly street photographers. Henri Cartier Bresson, William Klein, Robert Capa, Robert Frank, Garry Winogrand, all Leica men. The romantic idea of roaming the urban jungle with a compact camera and capturing the decisive moment revolves around the Leica. Handling one of these cameras is much like handling a jewel. The smooth shutter release button trips a discreet sound, a barely audible click, the result of the cloth shutter exposing the film – no cowfart of a mirror slap here. The film advance lever is silky smooth, nothing on the market compares, and the bright viewfinder is just breathtaking. Leicas are a joy to use, but more so than anything, Leica lenses are perhaps the most prized of all man-made optical jewels.

Leica lenses are said to produce creamy smooth bokeh, have excellent colour rendition and that they draw images so beautifully, some claim there is an indescribable ‘glow’, an x-factor if you like. This indescribable x-factor comes at a price. As an example, a Leica 35mm f2.0 summicron ASPH will set you back 2000 pounds. That’s Great British Pounds.

The two photos in this section was shot with the Leica M8 mounted with a 35mm f2 ASPH lens. Note the superiorly smooth bokeh, and then look at the overall aesthetic of the picture and then to the colour fidelity – it just produces sharp photos no? Part of the reason is also due to sensor design. Leicas use CCD sensors which do not have anti-aliasing (AA) filters in front of the sensors. The AA filter is a sort of ‘blur filter’ which is designed to minimise what is known as ‘moire’ patterns, artifacts associated with repeated lines and so forth. An AA filter is usually present in digital SLR sensors. The lack of one leads to clearer shots. Couple an AA-less sensor design with the super high-resolution Leica lenses and you have an impressive compact image making machine.

So what’s the catch? Well, for one, Leicas are horribly expenses. A Leica M8 (1.3cropped sensor) costs £2500, the Leica M9 (full frame sensor) costs £4850, and the lenses start at around £1200. Plus, the nearest focusing distance for all Leica lenses is 70cm. My 60mm f2.8 focuses down to 18cm. The picture above is about as close as I can get to the sushi with a 35mm lens. Yes there are macro modifiers which you can fit on to a Leica camera, but even then, it doesnt give you 1:1 reproduction, closer to 0.3x magnification, and the CCD sensors are bad at low light, really bad. I don’t use rangefinders to shoot food, they just cannot get me close enough. In spite of this though, I love shooting with the Leicas, the romantic idea of capturing the streets is too addictive to put down. After all, it is the way I have come to understand the medium : the art of document life today. With Leicas, its all heart, logic goes down the drain, along with your bank balance.

Point and shoots

Compact, sleek, desirable and practical. In the digital world, everybody has a point and shoot. Point and shoots are like rangefinders, without the rangefinder.

In the place of an optical viewfinder, the shutter simply keeps itself open so light passes from the lens straight through to the digital sensor. That’s how you get live view on the back of the LCD screen. Remember we spoke about cropped sensors? Well, digital compact sensors are typicaly 4 to 6 times smaller than full frame sensors. The significant reduction in sensor size means a significant reduction in cost and size of the lens, overall camera size and at the expense of also overall image quality. It’s basically taking a 35mm negative and cutting out 80% of the picture. Think about all that information you throw away! The smaller sensors mean higher depth of field for equivalent focal lengths, so shooting at say f2.0 on a point and shoot will give you an equivalent depth of field of say f8 on full frame.

Technology is rapidly catching up these days, and manufacturers are able to pull out even the tiniest detail from the compact sensors. So much so that many foodbloggers have created very accomplished photographs using point and shoot cameras. If I were to invest in a point and shoot, it would have to be the Leica Dlux-4, Titan edition. It features a 1/1.6 sensor, which is about a 4.3 crop and it’s twin brother the Panasonic Lumix LX3 is basically the same camera but without the hefty Leica price tag. £399 vs £500. The other contender is the Canon G11 with a 1/1.7 sensor, a 4.5 crop and retails for around £400. The little brother the Canon S90 is slightly cheaper and smaller, utilises the same sensor, but the former is built more robustly, has a fold-out LCD and has a more versatile lens which focuses down to 1cm compared to the 5cm of the S90. But as I said, if I had to choose, I would get the Dlux4. Helen the World Foodie Guide uses it, and it gives fantastic results.

Large sensored Point and Shoots and EVILs

After about a decade of digital sensor technology, pros lugging around heavy and over expensive gear, fear of being heckled as a pap, photographers are now uniformly crying out for large sensor technology to be squeezed into more compact packages. The premise is simple really, why can’t we make point and shoot cameras with large sensors?

Well, we can now. Olympus and Panasonic are at the forefront of the large sensor, compact body philosophy. With the advent of a new sensor format known as micro 4/3, or a sensor with a 2x crop factor, this allows manufacturers to make cameras which rival digital SLRs in image quality. Professionals are already jumping on the bandwagon. Enter the Olympus EP-1 and the EP-2. They fall under the new moniker of ‘EVIL’ cameras or ‘Electronic Viewfinder with Interchangeable Lens’, that are much smaller than SLRs and comparable in size to digital compacts. Think point and shoot, no optical viewfinder and interchangeable lens ala an SLR. The premise is to put even more ‘professional’ imaging power in hands of the hobbyist. My dad’s friend who has been a photo journalist for about 25 years has thus far avoided going digital, until he saw the Olympus. His very first digital camera. And he isn’t alone. Thom Hogan has taken his EP-1 on his photographic journeys. The other player to embrace the m4/3 EVIL bandwagon is Panasonic with their GF-1. Same deal as the Oly EP-1 really, and both cameras are at the forefront of this brand new revolution which is taking the digital photography world by storm. Very soon, the idea of paps lugging overly large cameras will be a thing of the past. Sony and Nikon are both hard and work with their interpretation of EVIL cameras, though their output probably wont be ready till early 2011. There is another player in this large sensor, small body game though : Leica.

photo credit:leica camera

Pictured above is the Leica X1. It is the first point and shoot to utilise a APS-C sensor (in fact, some say the same Sony sensor as used in the Nikon D300). It has a Leica 24mm f2.8 elmarit lens (equivalent to 36mm FOV) and it is hand-built in Germany to a classic finish same as the flagship Leica M rangefinders. Leica lens quality, focuses down to 25cm (for macros), the shutter is completely silent, is great in low light. If I had £1400, this would be my food-blogging camera of choice. Discreet, sleek, unobtrusive and most of all excellent digital image quality. What more could you ask for? £1400 perhaps. There are whispers that other manufacturers are going down this path, so the next few months will be interesting to say the least. About the only other alternative to the X1 is the Sigma DP1 and DP2, but their FOVEON sensors aren’t exactly true 12mp sensors, it’s more like a very high quality 4mp. The future of foodblogging? You decide.

Medium Format

So now that we have exhausted all the compact camera choices, what else is there? Well, a whole other level, that’s what else.

photo credit:hassleblad

In the grand scheme of things, the 35mm format is tiny. Think about it, it stretches only about 36mm on its longest end – that will never give you real detail and true description. What you need is to capture light on a much bigger canvas. Enter Medium format. Negatives measure to 60mm by 60mm and their digital equivalents are made to similar dimensions. If you want real detail, as I said, the key in is a big sensor. A much bigger one. As far as I know, pros use digital MF, albeit in a controlled studio enviroment to shoot magazine spreads, be it food or fashion. And as far as I know, billboards are mostly shot with digital MF cameras. Hassleblad is the leader of the pack, though there are alternatives such as Mamiya. Personally, this is next level stuff for me, I’ve never touched a MF camera before, but if I do decide, then I want a Hassy 503 CW. It is a true system camera which can be interchanged with a film back or a digital back. It shoots square images. Now if only I had another £10,000 lying around…

Film vs Digital

Beyond medium format, there are large format cameras, we would be stepping back in time to talk about them really, and they slow the photographic process down significantly, and it’s all film based.

Real photography. Art photographers mostly use large format film cameras to make their pictures. Andreas Gursky with his grand pictures, repeating patterns, macro social landscape photographs comes to mind, and my personal favourite are Dan Winter’s editorial portraits. Painterly, truly next next level stuff. As good as digital is, I don’t believe film will ever die, and I hope it never dies out because film still has a quality and a character which digital doesn’t quite yet seem to have managed. I feel that film stock produces colours and tone which are smoother, and just more natural. My film of the moment is Kodak Portra 400NC – for neutral colour. Perhaps we need to wait for the ghost in the machine to manisfest. Film is slower than digital, usually daylight balanced and fail in artificial light, much harder to master, but when you nail the exposure on film, it’s special. Ok then a little test, film vs digital. One is shot with a Nikon FM2 with a 50mm f1.4 lens with Fuji 160 film ; the other is shot with a Nikon D90 with a 16-85mm zoom lens set at 36mm. Which is which? Which is better? Does it really matter?

So there is it, a foodbloggers’ guide to cameras. Hopefully I will have piqued your interest in not just cameras, but also photography in general, subtle as it is, they are not the same thing. At the end of the day, having gone through several thousand pounds worth of camera and lenses, I feel that getting bogged down with camera choices did not instantly improve my photography. Everytime I changed systems, I learnt the strengths and weaknesses of the system and adapted to the camera to best draw out it’s potential. But the same problem always presented itself. Was the light good, how shall I compose the image? Is this a good subject to shoot? If so, will it make an enticing photograph? No camera has been able to to take away from the decision making process every time I make an exposure, and I wouldn’t want it to either. I make the photograph, not my camera.

I was in transit at Changi Airport for a day, spending the night at the transit hotel. In Asia, there is generally less fuss about cameras in public spaces (if Airports are indeed public). On the other hand, Singapore is generally tourist friendly. I flew with the massive A380s, on the upper deck, throughout the flight, passengers were wanting to grab a shot of this historic engineering feat. I had my camera firmly round my neck for the entire leg of the journey, and nervously wanting to make a photo essay of this from the very beginning. While in transit, the airport seemed a microcosm of life, a bubble that exists within its own set of rules, and observing life inside, felt abit like being in another country all together. I was sight seeing I suppose. It starts at the departure lounge at Heathrow, and ends at the departure lounge at Changi.

<< back to start >>

Current Panel: Total Panels:

I really like iA‘s ideas about revolutionising the way we read and consume digital media, and how there is a shift toward a much more organic web that moulds to the reader experience. I wanted something alot more practical, and also something which could display uniformly across all browsers. The iA template made a lot of sense since it was relatively affordable, it is a proven design from a totally awesome design agency and they were using it anyway. What I valued most was the modular design, everything can be changed, the css is simple enough to re-jig, and typography looks great with the open ended frame.

Digital c41

I like the idea of photography books, and have somewhat been obsessed with finding a digital equivalent which can reproduce the mystique of flipping through a paper movie. The Americans for the digital age. I really like Deep Sleep Magazine. At the same time, I find myself stocking up the fridge with packs of Portras. Film rocks.

The Photographs

My portfolios are categorised above and are flash enabled slideshows. If you hover your mouse over the left-middle, it will go full screen. Otherwise, it works as a windowed 1000px wide frame, which should be large enough for most screens. I will add more work as time goes by. Currently I have three albums online : Food, Inside Restaurants and Kate&Dipo (a wedding). Click on one and enjoy the show.

Anything Else

I write photography related blog posts on occasions when I feel like talking about something that inspired me. The entire backlog is filed under Articles. Would love some feedback on the design, if something doesn’t look right, just shoot me an email.

I’m based in London, I take pictures of food firstly then everything else and if you want to use me for a project, my contact details are below. You can read more about me here.

So here’s the situation. Armed police officers have been using laws to search, arrest, detain and stop photographers both amateurs and award wining pros from making photographs in public. There’s something a little disturbing to find that one has to look over one’s shoulder just to take snapshots while in public. So in an effort to hit back at the lunacy, PHNAT has invited everyone with a passion for the photography to gather at a mass photo gathering to stand in support for street photography, and to defend our rights, to simply photograph. I love street photography. I love that things are always in motion around me. I love that I feel so alive when trying to capture the life and times. The streets are beautiful you know, there’s always something happening, some decisive moment that I am missing at every second corner and out on the streets, photographing people and how they interact with the world makes me feel so humble, so small and realise that I am a part of a grand scheme of things.

Some 2000 photographers descended upon Trafalgar Square at high noon on an overcast Saturday afternoon. I have never seen so many cameras concentrated in one location before. All the L lenses were out on the occasion, the Nikons certainly did not disappoint either, and the Leica Louts were standing tall and proud. There was a general atmosphere of warmth and I could tell that everybody loved their craft, be it a hobby or profession, everybody had a common passion to make photographs. Naturally, the first thing I did when I got there was to simply take pictures, and I was not alone. I could hear a harmonious wave of shutters going off. I felt comfortable, like we were one big family, and it was an amazing feeling to have the approval of everybody around us, when we wanted to take a picture. It was like being at the largest ever photo walk, and everybody knew what to do – everybody was photographing everybody else. I love photography, and today I realised I was not alone. We are photographers, we are not terrorist. And so I was glad to have attended and support this rally. I hope this set of black and whites documenting what I saw goes a little in helping the campaign and to helping those in power understand why we love taking photographs.Hope you’ll enjoy this one folks.

(oh and I also made a set of colour shots and you can see them at my flickr account here)

<< back to start >>

Current Panel: Total Panels:

I’m a huge fan of The Americans, it is my favourite photo book of all time. I think of it as the classic paper movie and Robert Frank’s cinematic style is a massive influence on my work. I only wish I could capture a little bit of Robert Frank’s magic, but the man has an eye for not only a personal moment, but also a skill in creating atmosphere when he makes the viewer see his photographs in the sequence he had intended. I had been to Taipei once before in 2009, and the lasting impression the metal metropolis had on me, was its effervescent bustle. The city was bursting at the seams with motion, people, chatter and streetfood. A pumping jive which was electrifying just to watch the stories unfold before my eyes.

I didn’t photograph much during that time, but the memory of the visit loomed in my memory. I had promised myself that if I return to the city, I would try my best to capture the streets on film. I revisited the city in February 2010, returning in the middle of its winter and saw the dawn of the new lunar year – the Tiger year. Winter meant three days and three nights of rain, but it did not stop me from losing myself in the side streets and the underbelly of the urban jungle and being a spectator of the side stories. I wanted to capture the city’s essence, it’s pumping jive, the crass clash of the new metal and glass buildings building on top of the old shop houses. The city’s neon lit night, the blissful locals breathing soul into the city and all this life happening all around.

Presenting my Taipei Street Stories. A digital paper movie, told from the streets of Taipei.

58 photographs.

Under construction, the new building on the old.

Street food seller opening for breakfast.

Three days of rain, all the umbrellas are out.

Fireworks. First day of work, in the new year of the Tiger.

On the way to the bank, Monday morning.

Breakfast time.

The owner of a Beef noodle soup gesturing while watching TV.

Selling coats on the walkway.

Women inside a street market.

Shoppers making their way into the street market.

Flogging clothes on a pedestal.

Clutching a shopping receipt. All receipts also double as a national lottery ticket.

Burberry scarf, lottery ticket seller.

The rain has stopped, but the umbrella now sheilds from UV rays.

Post, green is local; red is international.

A couple on a vespa on a date.

Fish by the sea.

Fishermen bbq sausages while fishing by the sea.

A couple on a date, one of their hang out spots.

Kids playing on the beach.

Sunday afternoon.

A street fiddler.

Watching Taipei.

Two men and a dog.

Enticed by the street food.

Enticed by the street toys.

Husband and wife.

A street artist with a customer.

Praying with posters.

Waiting for the bus.

Artist in transit on the MRT.

A cluster of vespas.

The cluster on the move.

Crossing the road.

Watermelon umbrella.

Husband and wife, much later.

Watching the city go by.

The year of the Tiger, shop window.

Day turns to night, ximending.

Collecting for charity.

Friends.

Kevin’s Tattoo.

Waiting for takeaway at Hi Sushi.

Visiting the bookstore.

Totally engrossed.

An angel promoting her store.

Red Lanterns outside of SOGO, department store.

Mother and daughter at night.

The city lights, after dark.

A couple speeding, probably  away on a date.

Inside seven eleven, shopping dog.

The house cat, cleaning.

Riding the MRT one last time.

Four types of city transport.

Bicycles, all chained and unused.

Old guys playing chess at the park.

Old guy falling asleep at the park.

Cleaning up, closing up.

<< back to start >>

Current Panel: Total Panels: